| 5,218 | 263 | 45 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
群体性事件——部分群众与行政当局或强势社会集团的对抗性冲突,是一种典型的集群行为。2004年发生的重庆万州事件,可看作群体性事件的里程碑:原本普通的民事或治安纠纷,行政执法人员一介入处理,冲突矛头立刻转向行政当局,众多与诱发事件无关的旁观者卷入冲突;提出宽泛而模糊的政治诉求。这些新特征表明,群众普遍积蓄着不满情绪。在整个社会生活水平提高的今天,这种社会不满情绪只能用相对剥夺来解释。相对剥夺指与参照群体相比,个体对自身所处的不利地位的一种感知;相对满意是其反面,即与参照群体相比,个体对自身所处的有利地位的一种感知。相对剥夺-满意则整合了上述两个概念。本研究通过模拟实验模拟群体性事件中的冲突矛头转向,考察相对剥夺与相对满意对集群行为的影响。实验为单因素被试间设计,招募大学在校男生60名。研究发现:相对剥夺的个体比相对满意的个体更有可能参与集群行为;群体相对剥夺-满意部分中介了个体相对剥夺-满意与集群行为的关系;集群认同对相对剥夺-满意与集群行为的关系具有调节作用。
Abstract：Mass incidents refer to a kind of antagonistic conflicts between the public and administrative authority or powerful social groups. They are typical collective actions (CA)that individuals are acting as representatives of the group and the action is directed at improving the conditions of the entire group. The "Wanzhou incident" happened in 2004 is considered as a milestone,which shows two new characters of mass incidentsone is that,after civil dissension occurred,the target of the conflict soon turns to local administrative authority;the other is that the appeal is carried to the authority for ambiguous political requests rather than economic ones. This social discontent could only be attributed to relative deprivation(RD)which refers to one's perception or feeling of disadvantage in comparison with a reference group. Relative gratification (RG)is the converse of relative deprivation-one's perception or feeling when the outcome of a comparison is positive. RD and RG are generalized in relative deprivation-gratification (RD-G). This study is conducted to simulate the mass incidents in laboratory and to examine the effects of RD-G on CA. This experiment is one-factor between subject design and the participants are 60 college male students. Results reveal that 1)Individuals in the RD condition are more likely to engage in collection action than individuals in the RG condition;2) group RD-G partly mediates the relation between individual RD-G and CA;3) collective identity moderates the relation between RD-G and CA.
[1]节选自Buss和Perry所编的攻击性五点量表:前9道测量身体攻击性(Physical Aggression);后5道测量言语攻击性(Verbal Ag-gression),参见文献[40]。
[1]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2008[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2009:37.
[2]World Bank.China Country Economic Memorandum:Pro-moting Growth with Equity[R].Washington,DC:WB,2003.
[3]United Nations Development Programme.Human Development Report2007/2008[R].New York:UNDP,2007.
[4]中国社会科学院.2005年社会蓝皮书[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:78.
[5]汝信,陆学艺,李培林.2009年中国社会形势与预测[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:10.
[6]汝信,陆学艺,李培林.2010年中国社会形势与预测[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009:8.
[7]于建嵘.我国农村群体性突发事件研究[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2002,4(4):10-13.
[8]卢兴亚.群体性事件社会心理学分析[J].四川警官高等专科学校校报,2007(5):84-89.
[9]黄顺康.重大群体性事件冲突阻断机制探析[J].贵州社会科学,2009(1):44-49.
[10]STOUFFER S A,SUCHMAN E A,DEVINNEY L C,et al.The American Soldier:Vol.1.Adjustment during Army Life[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1949.
[11]于建嵘.集体行动的原动力机制研究[J].学海,2006(2):26-32.
[12]王庆功.关于社会弱势群体与群体性事件问题之思考[J].山东社会科学,2006(10):37-41.
[13]黄辉,徐建华,张晓红.广东省群体性事件多发的态势与防范对策[J].政法学刊,2006,23(4):33-36.
[14]窦宝国.和谐社会建设视域下的群体性突发事件论析[J].武汉学刊,2009(3):22-25.
[15]RUNCIMAN W G.Relative Deprivation and Social Justice:A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1966.
[16]CROSBY F J.A Model of Egoistical Relative Deprivation[J].Psychological Review,1976,83(2):85-113.
[17]WALKER I,PETTIGREW T F.Relative Deprivation Theory:An Overview and Conceptual Critique[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,1984,23(4):301-310.
[18]WALKER I,SMITH H.Relative Deprivation:Specification,Development and Integration[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,2002.
[19]MARTIN J.Relative Deprivation:A Theory of Distributive Injustice for an Era of Shrinking Resources[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,1981(3):53-107.
[20]SMITH H J,SPEARS R,OYEN M."People Like Us:"The Influence of Personal Deprivation and Salience of Group Membership on Justice Evaluations[J].Journal of Experi-mental Social Psychology,1994,30(3):277-299.
[21]VANNEMAN R D,PETTIGREW T F.Race and Relative Deprivation in the Urban United States[J].Race,1972,13(4):461-486.
[22]DAMBRUN M,TAYLOR D M,MCDONALD D A,et al.The Relative Deprivation-Gratification Continuum and the Attitudes of South Africans toward Immigrants:A Test of the V-Curve Hypothesis[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91(6):1032-1044.
[23]WRIGHT S C,TAYLOR D M,MOGHADDAM F M.Responding to Membership in a Disadvantaged Group:From Acceptance to Collective Protest[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58(6):994-1003.
[24]ZOMEREN M V,POSTMES T,SPEARS R.Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action:A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-psychological Perspectives[J].Psychological Bulletin,2008,134(4):504-535.
[25]张书维,周洁,王二平.群体相对剥夺前因及对集群行为的影响——基于汶川地震灾区民众调查的实证研究[J].公共管理学报,2009,6(4):69-78.
[26]AWAKAMI K,DION K L.Social Identity and Affect as Determinants of Collective Action:Toward an Integration of Relative Deprivation and Social Identity Theories[J].Theory and Psychology,1995,5(4):551-577.
[27]GILBERT D,FISKE S,LINDZEY G.Handbook of Social Psychology[M].Boston:McGraw-Hill,1998:504-553.
[28]GUIMOND S,DAMBRUN M.When Prosperity Breeds Inter-group Hostility:The Effects of Relative Deprivation and Relative Gratification on Prejudice[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2002,28(7):900-912.
[29]LICKONE T.Moral Development and Behavior:Theory,Research,and Social Issues[M].New York:Academic Press,1976:281-313.
[30]IYER A,LEACH C W,CROSBY F J.White Guilt and Racial Compensation:The Benefits and Limits of Self Focus[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2003,29(1):117-129.
[31]LEACH C W,IYER A,PEDERSEN A.Anger and Guilt about Ingroup Advantage Explain the Willingness for Political Action[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2006,32(9):1232-1245.
[32]HARTH N S,KESSLER T,LEACH C W.Advantaged Group's Emotional Reactions to Intergroup Inequality:The Dynamics of Pride,Guilt,and Sympathy[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2008,34(1):115-129.
[33]GUIMOND,SIMARD L D.Relative Deprivation Theory and the Quebec Nationalist Movement:The Cognition-Emotion Distinction and the Personal-Group Deprivation Issue[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983,44(3):526-535.
[34]FOSTER M D,MATHESON K.Double Relative Deprivation:Combining the Personal and Political[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1995,21(11):1167-1177.
[35]TAJFEL H,BILLIG M G,BUNDY R P.Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior[J].European Journal of Social Psychology,1971,1(2):149-178.
[36]POSTMES T,SMITH L G E.Why Do the Privileged Resort to Oppression?A Look at Some Intragroup Factors[J].Journal of Social Issues,2009,65(4):769-790.
[37]IYER A,RYAN K M.Why Do Men and Women Challenge Gender Discrimination in the Workplace?The Role of Group Status and In-Group Identification in Predicting Pathway to Collection Action[J].Journal of Social Issues,2009,65(4):791-814.
[38]BREWER M B,KRAMER R M.The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior[J].Annual Review of Psychology,1985,36:219-243.
[39]DOOSJE B,ELLEMERS N,SPEARS R.Perceived Intragroup Variability as a Function of Group Status and Identification[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1995,31(5):410-436.
[40]BUSS A H,PERRY M.The Aggression Questionnaire[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,63(3):452-459.
[41]张厚粲,徐建平.现代心理与教育统计学(第3版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009.
[42]KLANDERMANS B.Mobilization and Participation:Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory[J].American Sociological Review,1984,49:583-600.
[43]STMER S,SIMON B.Collective Action:Towards a Dual-Pathway Model[J].European Review of Social Psychology,2004,15(1):59-99.
[44]MUMMENDEY A,KESSLER T,KLINK A,et al.Strategies to Cope With Negative Social Identity:Predictions by Social Identity Theory and Relative Deprivation Theory[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,76(2):229-245.
[45]ZOMEREN M V,SPEARS R,LEACH C W.Exploring Psy-chological Mechanisms of Collective Action:Does Relevance of Group Identity Influence How People Cope with Collective Disadvantage?[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,2008,47(2):353-372.
[46]DIFONZO N,BORDIA P.Rumors and Stable-Cause Attri-bution in Prediction and Behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2002,88(2):785-800.
[47]李大治,王二平.公共政策制定程序对政策可接受性的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(6):1093-1101.
基本信息:
中图分类号:D035.1
引用信息:
[1]张书维,王二平,周洁.相对剥夺与相对满意:群体性事件的动因分析[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(03):95-102+127.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(70731004); 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-YW-R-130)
2010-07-20
2010-07-20