公共管理学报

中国社会普遍存在着资源约束型乡村，其产业发展困境更具特殊性，通常无法依靠自身力量突破发展困局。然而，在中国乡村发展实践中，政府、市场、集体的协同为这类乡村的产业提供了兼具内外整合性、农民主体性和制度多元性的新内源发展范式。基于四川省遂宁市卧牛寺村的案例研究，揭示了政府、市场、集体协同推动资源约束型乡村突破产业发展困局的机制，研究发现：政府在这一实践中由赋能者角色逐步转向监管者角色；市场主要发挥资源配置和价值创造功能；集体则作为联结并调节政府、市场与村民关系的枢纽。三者的协同在本质上是政府逻辑、市场逻辑和村社逻辑的互补，通过产业动能转换、产业链路赋能和权责动态分配，切实回应了新内源发展的内在要求，有效推动了资源约束型乡村产业的新内源发展。本文结论旨在为当下广泛存在的资源约束型乡村提供产业发展的实践性指导和地方性经验，同时为探索政府、市场和集体的良性互动关系提供理论参考。

In China, resource-constrained villages are widespread, facing distinctive challenges in industrial development that are difficult to overcome through endogenous efforts alone. However, the synergy among the state, market, and collectives in rural development practice has fostered a new endogenous development paradigm characterized by external-internal linkages, farmer agency, and institutional plurality. A case study of Woniushi Village in Suining, Sichuan Province, demonstrates how tripartite collaboration enables such villages to break through industrial stagnation. The rural industrial development process unfolds in two phases: External facilitation and co-evolution, with the collective serving as the core actor throughout. Actor consensus shifts from "agricultural chain extension" to "multifunctional agricultural development". The state transitions from an enabler providing policy support to a regulator via delegated governance; The market allocates resources and creates value, extending from upstream factor markets to downstream product markets; The collective acts as a critical nexus, integrating resources, mediating interests, and incorporating farmers to link the state, market, and villagers. This synergy reflects the complementarity of state, market, and community logics, avoiding excessive administrative intervention, mitigating market inequities, and promoting integrated development while preserving farmer agency. Thus, it aligns with the requirements of the new endogenous development pathway and effectively advances industrial progress in resource-constrained rural China. This study aims to deconstruct and delineate the structures, dynamics, and strategies in the industrial development of such villages, offering practical guidance and localized insights for widely prevalent resource in the constrained rural contexts, while contributing to the exploration of constructive interactions among the state, market, and collectives.